I sometimes wonder if publicly expressed hostility to the
Orange Order is one of the few remaining prejudices which are tolerated in
contemporary Scottish society. Certainly at the public hearing of the City of Edinburgh
Council Licensing sub-committee on Tuesday 22 July several of the elected
councillors on the committee made known their resentment and antagonism towards
the Order as it sought to gain approval for its right to march in the city on
13 September, five days before the independence referendum. It was arrogant of
the SNP committee convenor of the committee, Gavin Barrie, to state that the
Order had nothing to contribute to the referendum debate. It is not for our elected
representatives to decide who has valid contributions to make to the debate. It
is up to the people to decide what they want to say and how to express their
views within the law. The councillors’ role was to see that the law was applied
and following police and legal advice they accepted the right of the Order to
stage the parade, although a Labour and a Conservative councillor opposed the
motion. I was puzzled as to how the Conservative, Councillor Dominic Heslop,
stated that he found the comments by the Orange Order representative, who was
seeking the right of the Order to parade and express its views, to be ‘imflammatory’.
Whether Scotland votes for independence or not it will always be a challenge to
ensure that Christian religious organisations like the Orange Order, and other
minority groups, have their rights protected when much public opinion is opposed
to them.
Letter in the Scotsman 25 July 2014
Letter in the Scotsman 25 July 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.